21/ THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CENTRALIZED AND DECENTRALIZED GOVERNANCE OF SOCIETY: EVENTS IN KAZAKHSTAN
Centralized governance can be understood as governance stemming from a single control point, as opposed to decentralized governance, which originates from multiple autonomous control points sharing a common goal. That serves as an introductory definition to clarify the concepts used in the rest of the text.
EXAMPLE OF CENTRALIZED GOVERNANCE
Classic centralized governance can be observed in our "civilized" Western society practically everywhere. A typical example is the pyramid-like crowd-elite governance schemes, where the CEO (Chief Executive Officer) determines the direction, delegates tasks to management, who then pass instructions to supervisors, who finally direct workers.
Each governance layer depends on commands from the higher level, originating from a single point—the CEO. The knowledge of each layer is limited to its defined competencies. No one knows more than necessary, everyone has their place, role, and specific task. The CEO's command mechanism resembles the work of a programmer optimizing a program.
This governance model essentially robotizes our society, creating stereotypes and "bio-robots." Consider advanced centralized governance schemes for billions of people in China (e.g., the social credit system). People in this system are defined as human resources, and the results of their activities (outcomes) often matter more than the people themselves who produce these numbers.
Centralized governance is not limited to business but is also evident in the military and even within the church. Crowd-elitism has clear value in less developed societies, playing an undeniable role in governing simpler societies where only a small portion of the population understands governance mechanisms.
The problem arises when idiots reach the top of the governance pyramid and begin leading humanity toward self-destruction. This model, therefore, does not belong in our shared future. Although centralized governance may appear efficient with robotic precision, it is fragile and prone to failure.
When confronted with decentralized governance, centralized systems quickly collapse.
EXAMPLE OF DECENTRALIZED GOVERNANCE
It is difficult to find a fully decentralized governance example in our society—it simply doesn’t exist yet. Our technological level and overall development remain relatively low for fully understanding its advantages.
Our simplified and imperfect education system produces too few individuals capable of governing society, managing themselves, their surroundings, and understanding one another. However, a mix between centralized and decentralized governance has existed in the world for some time (a few decades).
In individual companies, decentralized governance manifests when CEOs and management aim to educate employees to understand company processes thoroughly. Employees in such companies are trained to work in various positions, with significant resources (time) invested in education, often involving senior management. These are typically family-owned businesses.
At the state level, federations exemplify decentralized governance, where each region is responsible for its environment and manages its area.
CONTINUED ANALYSIS
I will proceed with the next section, delving deeper into the differences and implications of governance systems, along with the real-world example of Kazakhstan.
THEORETICAL ADVANTAGES OF DECENTRALIZED GOVERNANCE
In theory, applying fully decentralized governance leads to significant stability and activates society’s auto-correction mechanisms. All destructive processes are detected and eliminated early by autonomous individuals within the society. Such a society is creative, continuously evolving over time, and boundless, reflecting the self-organizing principles of our universe.
(More is discussed in the article: https://www.projektz.sk/news/20-nehas-co-ta-nepali/)
PRACTICAL EXAMPLES: KAZAKHSTAN EVENTS
Recently, we witnessed the advantages of decentralized governance not just theoretically but also practically. We observed how precise robotic governance schemes collapsed when confronted with creativity—within mere hours. This reality was demonstrated by the events in Kazakhstan.
THE CURRENT GLOBAL SITUATION
Globally, we are witnessing a confrontation between an outdated crowd-elite system of societal governance—completely dominated by corporations—and the human elite, which fully understands the necessity for widespread development, awareness, and independence of human society.
Corporations represent groups of individuals blinded by power, focused solely on the advantages derived from centralized governance, and resistant to losing their grip on authority. In contrast, the human elite strives for the collective evolution of society.
The global elite oversees this struggle, preventing catastrophic failures for humanity (e.g., the use of nuclear weapons in conflicts).
Corporations still hold three weapons that allow them to govern their crowd-elite society temporarily in the 21st century: centralized governance, propaganda, and fear. However, these weapons will ultimately backfire on them. They will "perish" by the very tools they use to maintain control.
Humanity is in the "birth pangs" of a new societal order.
KAZAKHSTAN
I believe that the decisive battle between competing groups has already occurred. This was the direct confrontation of governance elites in Kazakhstan. Everything was at stake in Kazakhstan.
A film released in advance on December 24, 2021, on Netflix—Don’t Look Up!—foreshadowed the significance of this event. (I wrote about the movie here: https://blog.hlavnespravy.sk/29189/nepozri-sa-hore-tip-na-film/).
In the film, notice the scene where DiCaprio learns about an explosion at Baikonur (a Russian cosmodrome located in Kazakhstan). From that moment, the movie transitions to a "last supper" scenario, as humanity’s hope has seemingly vanished.
I consider the film a work of globalists, who uniquely inform the public about critical issues affecting humanity.
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF BAIKONUR
Baikonur plays a key role in the Kazakhstan conflict. No leadership in the world could maintain control if it lost such a significant space base.
Had Kazakhstan shifted away from the Russian sphere due to a "Maidan 2.0"-style revolution, the entire Russian system would have destabilized. The human elite would have been fragmented and destroyed, paving the way for a unipolar world with a single governance system.
This event was a pivotal moment of the 21st century. Corporations invested everything they had—resources, strategies, and influence—into this conflict.
The Kazakhstan events demonstrated the unity, decisiveness, and efficiency of the human elite in today’s world, as well as the devastating effectiveness of decentralized governance.
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE EVENT
Many of us may not fully grasp the importance of this event, or perhaps we missed it altogether due to the rapid resolution of the situation. The decisive phase of the conflict lasted less than 24 hours. To understand the event’s importance, we must focus not on the conflict’s duration but on its timing and the lengthy preparations leading up to it.
Since 2014, when Ukraine’s government was successfully changed through street protests (Euromaidan), the CIA began preparing for a similar conflict in Kazakhstan. Ukrainian veterans from the Maidan, commanders experienced in destabilizing Ukraine’s government through a "color revolution," were involved.
Over seven years, while the world’s attention was elsewhere, more than 20,000 mercenaries and fighters were trained in Kazakhstan and neighboring countries. These individuals had precise tasks to destabilize significant portions of the country.
Corporate entities within Kazakhstan—established during President Nazarbayev’s tenure and profiting from selling natural resources to the West—provided cover and facilitated the training. Kazakhstan became a classic example of a wealthy nation with a poor population.
TIMING OF THE DESTABILIZATION
The timing of Kazakhstan’s destabilization was carefully planned to ensure its outcome was clear before critical negotiations about Europe’s security (on new governance frameworks for Europe) scheduled for January 10 and 12, 2022.
Corporations intended to negotiate with a weakened and destabilized Russia. However, their plans backfired spectacularly. Instead, the negotiations took place with a strong and organized Russia, while the corporations found themselves disoriented and fragmented.
BRIEF TIMELINE OF THE CONFLICT
-
January 1, 2022: Kazakhstan’s gas monopoly artificially raised domestic gas prices by 100%. With 60% of the population relying exclusively on gas-powered vehicles, this measure sparked significant public unrest.
-
January 3, 2022: Peaceful gatherings of angry citizens began in various Kazakh cities.
(Source: Al Jazeera) -
January 4–5, 2022: Organized, trained armed groups began infiltrating the protests.
(Source: Strana News)
Kazakhstan’s President Tokayev responded promptly. On January 4, he announced the government’s resignation and ordered the monopoly to restore prices to previous levels. This move took some leverage away from the organized groups attempting to exploit the protests. However, disinformation campaigns were immediately launched in organizational channels to keep people on the streets:
(Source: Rusnext)
ESCALATION AND INTERVENTION
-
January 5, 2022: Violence escalated to extremes. The President declared a state of emergency. Armed groups began occupying buildings, strategic points, and even the airport. Weapons were distributed from unmarked vehicles:
(Source: Twitter - ASB Military) -
Government forces were deployed to protect strategic sites:
(Source: Strana News) -
The internet was shut down nationwide:
(Source: Telegram - RIAN) -
President Tokayev requested assistance from the CSTO (Collective Security Treaty Organization).
ARRIVAL OF CSTO FORCES
Russian special forces were the first to arrive in the conflict zone, liberating the airport:
(Source: Telegram - Rusvesna)
On the same night, the first CSTO troops landed at the airport:
(Source: Telegram - RIAN)
Within a single day, CSTO forces secured all key strategic sites, including the Baikonur cosmodrome and ten biological laboratories. The 20,000-strong coordinated force was neutralized.
OUTCOMES OF THE CONFLICT
-
January 6, 2022: Kazakhstan’s Ministry of Internal Affairs announced that all individuals refusing to lay down their arms would face physical elimination. By the end of the day, CSTO forces had liberated and secured all key strategic sites, including the Baikonur cosmodrome and ten biological laboratories. The 20,000-strong army coordinated from a single center was deactivated or neutralized.
-
Nearly 6,000 individuals were detained, including many foreigners:
(Source: Telegram - TASS) -
January 10, 2022: President Tokayev provided a detailed briefing on the events during a CSTO video conference:
(Source: YouTube)
Additional details about the conflict are available on the forum:
https://www.aktualnikonflikty.cz/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=123&start=40
KEY INSIGHTS FROM THE CONFLICT
-
Early Warning:
On December 16, 2021, the U.S. Embassy in Kazakhstan issued a warning about potential demonstrations:
(Source: U.S. Embassy in Kazakhstan) -
Biological Laboratories:
The conflict appears to have involved broader issues beyond destabilizing Russia. The biological laboratories in Kazakhstan were likely one of the main targets.
(Source: CZ24 News)Russia had previously raised concerns about these laboratories through official channels:
(Source: YouTube) -
Rapid Resolution:
The speed at which the 20,000-strong force disbanded shocked the West. The old governance model and destabilization tactics failed against a simple yet effective solution—cutting off the head of the operation.
Modern electronic warfare technologies were deployed, blocking internet and GSM signals for 24 hours, severing communication with foreign command.
(Source: Hlavný Denník)Tokayev’s public statement in English, calling for the elimination of all terrorists without negotiation, played a crucial role in scaring and dispersing the leaderless groups:
(Source: Telegram - RIAN)
LOOKING AHEAD
The Kazakhstan conflict highlighted the fragility of the old corporate crowd-elite governance model. Advanced technologies, rooted in the latest scientific knowledge, are making this model obsolete. Humanity is on the brink of developing a new societal governance system.
If we avoid being led into a self-destructive nuclear war by centralized powers, we will witness the emergence of the world’s first decentralized governance model.
THE FUTURE OUTLOOK
The conflict in Kazakhstan revealed the vulnerabilities of the outdated corporate crowd-elite governance system. Modern technologies, based on the latest advancements, are driving humanity toward a new societal model.
We stand on the cusp of an era where education, upbringing, and the protection of life will become humanity's top priorities. Synchronizing our goals within a decentralized society will be supported by emerging technologies like telepathy, which will elevate our understanding to a precise, technical level. Language as we know it may become obsolete.
In such a framework, humanity can achieve widespread prosperity and open doors to exploring the universe beyond our planet. However, we are not there yet. Today, we must focus on addressing the challenges posed by those clinging to power in ignorance and fear of losing their positions.
THE THREAT OF NUCLEAR CONFLICT
Media reports frequently mention the looming threat of a massive conflict between Russia and the USA. However, at the conventional warfare level, such a conflict has already occurred earlier this year. Russia demonstrated its capabilities, technology, and internal strength. This allowed them to assert their conditions during security negotiations—conditions they will not compromise on.
Corporations are cornered, and the human elite is taking the initiative globally, making moves on the metaphorical chessboard without waiting for their opponents.
Corporations have only one option left: to push as close as possible to Russia’s borders and launch nuclear missiles. No other type of conflict is currently at play—only nuclear.
Our two airbases are expected to house nuclear weapons, positioned near residential areas. In the eyes of corporations, this is an ideal setup, using our people as a "human shield."
Whether a nuclear conflict is a genuine threat or merely a fear tactic by corporations to regain control is for you to decide. My suggestion: the global arbitrators—globalists—would never permit such a conflict.
HANDLING THE TENSE SITUATION IS SIMPLE
As demonstrated in Kazakhstan, the crowd-elite governance system is highly prone to failure. A single "button press" can disrupt it—figuratively speaking. In our case, this involves cutting off the actions of the fools in leadership through collective inaction.
Stop following the whims of those installed in positions of "authority." Ignore them completely. Withdraw our obedience. Stop consuming their media and propaganda. Gradually establish our own parallel governance structures.
Fools have as much power as we grant them and as much attention as we give them. Let’s cease giving them attention. From our respective positions, let’s disrupt the flow of control in their hierarchical pyramid structure. Soldiers, police officers, civil servants, judges, politicians, entrepreneurs, workers, and citizens—all must join in this collective disobedience. Our unity is key.
We live in an electronic age where every injustice is recorded, but so is every righteous act. This is a time of heroes and fools.
CAUTION ABOUT PUBLIC PROTESTS
We’ve seen how peaceful protests can quickly be co-opted to serve an opponent’s goals, creating dangerous situations. Today, there are other ways to express our stance. The most effective method is non-reaction while simultaneously building a new governance framework.
CONCLUSION
The year 2022 appears to be a decisive year with the potential to steer our future toward a sci-fi-like level of progress. It began with a critical event highlighting the contrast between the past and the future.
Let’s not waste time. Begin preparing a new societal governance model by educating the broader public. Ignore outdated individuals who are stuck in the last century. Focus on self-governance and managing our immediate surroundings.
Invest time in valuable pursuits—especially in nurturing future generations. Become the heroes of our era.
The principles of governance are simple—recognizing a few fundamental concepts of our world (particularly unity and self-organization) is enough. I strive to explain these principles in my project:
www.projektz.sk
Today, there are many similar projects with the same goal, easily accessible online.
The greater the level of decentralization we achieve in societal governance, the better auto-correction and stability we’ll gain for development. This decentralized governance model is also known as the Conception of Social Safety (KSB).
In such a system, fools will never seize power again.
Juraj Tušš
